There is now the so called big problem of the friends I have
made in communist territories having their safety and security threatened
because they were considered traitors but it is not an issue at all on the
whole – there is comradery between all public leaders worldwide, from democratic
and none democratic Countries, some leaders simply wish to disregard it and have
not yet produced a solution for the new problems that they have built. It does
not make sense to say that a leadership hated free market and globalisation
while they used it in part, so those who take a hard-line on the position of
other leaders, needed leave this to people in their Countries who were fans of
free and globalised market, seeing that it will serve a source of income if they felt
threatened and needed to migrate.
It eventually runs into the supposition that my attitude was
one that had constituted a process where I failed to set myself up for success
but this was never really the case – as I am more of a civil servant and tend
to make sense of the damage done by Celebrities here, by dragging them back to
my civil service as well – question of whether people were entitled to my
career or felt that they ought to be. The reality of it is that people cannot
make sense of my Books if they lived in the world of build a profile for myself
to make money by abusing others Celebrity culture and if I am not selling
Books, nobody is setting a career out in a professional manner, nothing is
being made easier for people to work with at the employment environment and
nobody is sharpening the edges when it comes to providing the general public
with a paid service. Those who did not see the world in these three dimension but had an obsession to get involved with me, were making a mess of my finances
and I have had enough of it too (I have been involved with the Celebrity issue, what is done to match my person and work exactly is usually not a threat as it is done in context of an act, what is done to divert my work and person towards another purpose or person on the other hand was vengeance for a wealth equity public life that had affected criminals, the boldness of getting involved with me indicating a sense that it happens because I had not yet taken the Law into my hands).
The usual idea is to say that they had given me a really
difficult time and it was fun but they had not achieved anything of that sort –
what really happens is that I could be beside myself on the misery and the
abuses from them which causes it, five seconds later, as if I had complained
about nothing, there will be a 90 second video that added up to a sale advertisement
for a product showing the idiots abusively entitling themselves to get involved
with me and making statements to suggest they can do that to any extent they
desired and make it as narcissistic as their stupidities wanted to, finished
off with claims of the way my existence had caused them to fight criminals, as
they picked up service processes at my Bookshop to put themselves in charge of
matters they knew nothing of. So the way it means that I was victim of their
narcissism and that narcissism was a source of happiness upon which a product
could be sold and unless I was dead, the source of happiness for them will
never run out, having been a preferred alternative to digging deep whenever
they wanted to show a Client the importance of a product they were trying to
sell, I guess the main idea is that I have not yet taken the Law into my hands
but overall, I have warned them enough time to channel the German and European
influence facilitated narcissism for popularity twats elsewhere or I will
channel it for them.
